Personal Opinion Archives

Southern Social Media 11-13-09

A “salty” version of Southern Social Media is in store for you today . . . I went on quite the rant about some recent happenings in the Internet Marketing world and some of the scam artists out there.

Topics include:

  • The southern definition of “barrier”
  • Two social media connections that have figured this stuff out that aren’t trying to get money from you . . . why they’re successful and how it can benefit your business.
  • Perry Belcher – Forewarning: SERIOUS rant ahead . . . this guy isn’t the “good guy” we all thought
  • StomperNet: buyer beware (why are they struggling financially if they’re getting $800/month and have “2,500 happy subscribers”? Something just doesn’t add up)
  • Brad Fallon’s $100,000 spending spree (as it pertains to StomperNet)
  • 5 Mistakes to Avoid with Social Media
  • Employing someone to help your business utilize social media
  • You might be a redneck . . . 3 full examples

From a personal standpoint, I feel 10 times better for getting this stuff off my chest, and I hope you listen in so that you don’t fall victim to some of the “mind control” marketing going on out there that is merely designed to mislead you and part your money from your wallet. While rants aren’t common, this one is sure to help you avoid some unsavory characters online.

Think Social Media Doesn't Cut Both Ways?

Over the past couple of hours, I’ve been doing some digging to get the “real inside scoop” on why Perry Belcher “decided” to get out of Internet Marketing Training and the truth behind Andy Jenkins exit from Stompernet.

I’ll get to the latter first . . . Andy’s exit from Stompernet wasn’t as amicable as they’ve tried (poorly) to suggest publicly.  There was a lawsuit between Andy, Stompernet, and Brad Fallon–not exactly the way to part “amicably.” It appears that Brad bought Andy out to avoid facing a lengthy and likely ugly trial. You can look at Andy Jenkins’ claim filed with a Georgia court by clicking on the link. Turns out Brad Fallon wasn’t doing a whole lot behind the scenes except spending money so Jenkins’ hand was somewhat forced, and I always thought I smelled a rat when they made the hasty change announcement back in July.

For full disclosure: I have the StomperNet “Stomping the Search Engines” DVDs, and count me as unimpressed.  Not to be a honk, but my Search Engine Ninja program gives you much more SEO training for a lot less, and there isn’t as much fluff, flare, and theory involved . . . just good old step-by-step stuff you can implement, but I digress.

My personal prediction is StomperNet will die a slow but painful death over the next 12-18 months. If you read the filed complaint, you’ll see some verbiage that suggests the company is in serious financial trouble already so I don’t feel like that prediction is too “risky.”

As an aside: I hope Paul Lemberg keeps doing his thing . . . just with a different organization behind him because Paul’s stuff is really good.  I hated to see that he aligned with StomperNet for his Formula 5 training program, and that is the primary reason I didn’t get it although I always enjoy learning from Paul.

Perry’s “demise” is more of a matter of massively over promoting and over pricing an absolute garbage product (as it turns out).  There is another similar product currently being offered in the Internet Marketing space that hopefully will be next on the “fraud” hit-list.

Before you think I’m piling on Perry, I came to “like” Perry through our occasional interactions on Twitter (which his account is completely gone by the way . . . all 110,000 followers worth), and I THOUGHT he was a “good guy.” Then I started doing my private investigator work to find that he is a convicted felon for defrauding people out of hundreds of thousands of dollars over the past 10 years for bogus medical products. I’m not one to cast stones at others that I don’t know unless it’s warranted, and it’s warranted here.  Anytime you take advantage of people to that degree, get caught then go back for more . . . you ain’t a “good guy!” Sorry, Per.

As for the lessons to be learned from these cases . . . social media can build you up rapidly, but it can rip you down even faster. Think of all the time and energy Perry put into building a following of 110,000 on Twitter, the countless blogs he setup to rebuild his “reputation,” myriad videos, and all the exposure social media gained him as he was promoting his “Social Media Money System.” His “system” simply didn’t deliver on the promise to show people how to make money with social media or grow a business for it’s $997 minimum price tag. People probably wouldn’t have been that upset with him if the price tag were something more reasonable like $97 or $197.

Bottom line: it only took about a month to tear everything down that took years to build . . . thanks to social media.

Perry now has a metric ton of guilt to carry around . . . knowingly defrauding people out of millions of dollars as he masqueraded around as this “great guy.” As I always say, you can lie to others, but you can’t lie to yourself. Now Perry can’t even lie to others . . . he’s been branded as a fraud twice in very public forums. The very forums he used to rebuild his reputation from the last fiasco. That brings me to this: what would you do if you were in his shoes?

Final point: If you’re looking for help with social media for growing your BUSINESS, seek out those that are using it to grow their businesses today . . . not somebody who can show you how to win an online popularity contest. Advertising firms aren’t the answer either because they haven’t figured out how to monetize social media for their own firms so there is a lot of blind leading the blind right now.

Don’t get ripped off!!!

UK Fans: Which one is it?

I’m jumping out of the business and marketing bag for just a moment to talk about sports and something that has been frosting my ass for awhile. Since I live in Kentucky, I hear this garbage all the time about Tubby Smith and wanted to share some facts to question both sides of UK fans’ arguments about their former coach. Here’s an e-mail I sent to one of the local radio sports talk show hosts (Lachlan McLean) in hopes that he shares this on the air.
————————————-

First off, let me state for the record that I’m a HUGE Louisville fan and loathe the Cayuts. With that said, I’m worn out by the UK contingent whining about Tubby Smith not being able to recruit and/or coach. Which one is it? Far be it from me to defend a former UK guy, but here are a couple of arguments to consider.

If somebody says he can’t recruit, how did he produce 9 NBA players in 10 years? We’re talking NBA—not NBDL, overseas, or any minor league pro basketball. In six plus years of Rick being here at UofL, we have ONE player in the NBA (Francisco Garcia). Here’s Tubby’s list of NBA players for good measure so no one can question the number:

  1. Tayshawn Prince
  2. Keith Bogans
  3. Gerald Fitch
  4. Erik Daniels
  5. Chuck Hayes
  6. Kelenna Azubuike
  7. Rajon Rondo
  8. Randolph Morris
  9. Jamaal Magloire

Of that bunch, the most heralded players were Rondo and Morris—the rest were not super sought after. So that begs the question—is it recruiting or coaching? One could easily argue, with 9 NBA players in 10 years, it was not recruiting.

If it’s coaching, how did Tubby guide them to 1 NCAA title, 3 Elite 8 and 2 Sweet 16 appearances? He never lost a first round game at UK. In the span Tubby was coach at UK, he won 76.0% of his games. The all-time percentage for UK Basketball is (drum-roll please) . . . 76.3%! Compare his winning percentage at UK to that of (mouse face) Mike Kryzewski’s at Duke (77.8%), and he’s not that far off (1.8%). If Kryzewski is considered one of the best college coaches, where does that leave Tubby? What that means, with all things being equal, Kryzewski would win a whopping one extra game in every 55 played based on those numbers. You don’t have to be a genius to realize that’s not very significant.

Let’s compare Tubby’s winning percentage to other coaches in UK’s history:

  • Rupp won 82.2% of his games at UK (which equates to winning 1 more game in every 16 than Tubby)
  • Joe B Hall–74.8%
  • Eddie Sutton—69.2%
  • Rick Pitino—81.9% (which equates to winning 1 more game in every 17)

So looking objectively at UK basketball historically illustrates the point that Tubby’s performance was very much in line with the tradition at UK. This notion that Tubby “underperformed” emphasizes how unrealistic UK fans truly are. When placing these facts into their proper context (remember: it’s a UofL fan analyzing them objectively), it makes you wonder what is in UK fans’ cool-aid to make them believe they deserve so much more. Look at the numbers before making the argument that Tubby can’t recruit or coach, and it’s pretty clear neither of those are valid points.

The reason for sending this e-mail and asking these questions is I am sick and tired of hearing UK fans whine, belly-ache, and complain about how terrible things were under Tubby. Ok, the style wasn’t the most enjoyable, but who cares? You won games at an extremely similar clip to what you have all-time so quit whining already!

It’s not my nature to contribute to anything UK related, but the facts tell a far different story than UK fans would like everyone to believe, and it’s time for them to own up to those facts.

Opinion: Why Carry a Gun?

You’ve all heard the phrase from the pro-gun crowd: “guns don’t kill people; people kill people.” True statement which I agree with in principle, but there was an incident in Jeffersontown, KY (a sub-city of Louisville) where a retired J-Town cop (Richard Koenig) and a citizen (Darren Pickerill) got into a bit of a road rage battle over a 4-way stop sign that makes you wonder.

To make a long story short, Pickerill, the citizen, is in the hospital in critical condition as a result of six to eight shots fired by Koenig, the retired cop. Apparently, Pickerill went out of turn at the 4-way intersection that incited a verbal exchange that quickly escalated into a shooting spree. Unconfirmed initial reports suggest that Pickerill possibly showed a gun as the two were arguing over the 4-way stop, and that propelled Koenig to open fire. Pickerill allegedly never fired a shot. All of this over a stupid 4-way stop sign? Amazing!

Yes, the guns in this case are not to blame, but would either of these people be in the position they are in today if neither of them had a gun? The worst that could have resulted is the two might have gotten into a physical confrontation where one or both got roughed up a bit, but they’d both live to talk about it and possibly even laugh about it one day. No one is laughing now, and I’d imagine Koenig is going to have some legal battles to wage as a result of his quick trigger. Pickerill is in pretty dire shape all because of the threat of showing a gun that caused another to flip out and shoot first.

I can’t say what I would have done in the exact situation because I’ve never been in it, and I hope I never am. I can say that I’ve been furious at 4-way stops several times because they really aren’t that hard to navigate, yet some people seem to think they are like solving a Rubik’s cube or something. It deeply concerns me that there are seemingly more and more people out there hunting for situations like this so they can shoot first then cry “self defense” (as Koenig is in this case) if something bad happens.

There are way more dumb drivers roaming the earth than any of us would prefer, but it’s not the end of the world when you encounter one. Flip them off, yell a little, maybe even stand on the gas to get around them, but let it go just as quickly as you blew up. You never know who might be packing heat looking for any reason to unload some rounds to compensate for some pitiful insecurity they have.

The moral of the story for me is nothing good comes from carrying a gun around even if you never plan to use it. The sheer fact that it’s there is a threat that it COULD be used, and people don’t tend to act rationally when they experience a little road (or instant) rage. The gun itself provides zero protection–using it does. Why tempt yourself and fate?

Why Are There So Many Single Americans?

Published: January 21, 2007
It’s worth repeating: the “marriage gap” isn’t about men and women. It’s about class and education.

Being a member of this group, I found Kate’s article interesting yet not that surprising. Marriage doesn’t make sense in far too many cases, and most people can be self sufficient without needing to rely on a partner. Women are better educated today and hold much more prominent roles in the workplace. In other words, what’s the point if you don’t plan on having a bunch of yard apes? The day isn’t far off to where we have contracts for set periods of time where we are committed/obligated to one partner.

Related study: 51% of Women Are Now Living Without Spouse (1/16/2007)


 Page 1 of 2  1  2 »