Observation Archives

CAN-SPAM Compliance = SPAM Anyway? WTF Infusionsoft?

Today, I’ve been doing battle with Infusionsoft over an email campaign to a small sample list of 3,150 dentists in nearby areas (from Louisville, KY).

To make a long story short, Infusionsoft has terminated my account even though I have been a Certified Marketing Automation Coach for nearly 2 years with them. In fact, I was in the original certification class that paid quite a bit of money (like $2,500 out of my own pocket) to get certified so I’m none too pleased that Infusionsoft and the nerds in their compliance department have taken such a stance with me, but life goes on as they say.

I have never committed any previous “violations.” I’d argue that I haven’t violated the CAN SPAM laws in this instance either, and I’ll present my side of the argument below.

In the spirit of learning and sharing experiences, I thought I’d share the details of the email in question that was sent and how it IS compliant with the CAN SPAM regulations set forth on the GOVERNMENT’S website (for a complete rundown, go here: http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/business/ecommerce/bus61.shtm)

The Primary FTC CAN-SPAM Provisions

  1. Don’t use false or misleading header information. Your “From,” “To,” “Reply-To,” and routing information – including the originating domain name and email address – must be accurate and identify the person or business who initiated the message.
  2. Don’t use deceptive subject lines. The subject line must accurately reflect the content of the message.
  3. Identify the message as an ad. The law gives you a lot of leeway in how to do this, but you must disclose clearly and conspicuously that your message is an advertisement.
  4. Tell recipients where you’re located. Your message must include your valid physical postal address. This can be your current street address, a post office box you’ve registered with the U.S. Postal Service, or a private mailbox you’ve registered with a commercial mail receiving agency established under Postal Service regulations.
  5. Tell recipients how to opt out of receiving future email from you. Your message must include a clear and conspicuous explanation of how the recipient can opt out of getting email from you in the future. Craft the notice in a way that’s easy for an ordinary person to recognize, read, and understand. Creative use of type size, color, and location can improve clarity. Give a return email address or another easy Internet-based way to allow people to communicate their choice to you. You may create a menu to allow a recipient to opt out of certain types of messages, but you must include the option to stop all commercial messages from you. Make sure your spam filter doesn’t block these opt-out requests.
  6. Honor opt-out requests promptly. Any opt-out mechanism you offer must be able to process opt-out requests for at least 30 days after you send your message. You must honor a recipient’s opt-out request within 10 business days. You can’t charge a fee, require the recipient to give you any personally identifying information beyond an email address, or make the recipient take any step other than sending a reply email or visiting a single page on an Internet website as a condition for honoring an opt-out request. Once people have told you they don’t want to receive more messages from you, you can’t sell or transfer their email addresses, even in the form of a mailing list. The only exception is that you may transfer the addresses to a company you’ve hired to help you comply with the CAN-SPAM Act.
  7. Monitor what others are doing on your behalf. The law makes clear that even if you hire another company to handle your email marketing, you can’t contract away your legal responsibility to comply with the law. Both the company whose product is promoted in the message and the company that actually sends the message may be held legally responsible.

So there you have it in a nutshell.  Let’s look at the email I sent and determine (together) whether I’m “compliant” or not.

Initial email sent to dental pros

Initial email sent to dental pros on 12/10/09

Ok, let’s pick this thing apart as objectively as possible.

FTC Requirement #1: Don’t use false or misleading header information

The header information used my primary email address and did not hide behind any IP spoofing or multi-IP addressing schemes. Check.

FTC Requirement #2: Don’t use deceptive subject lines.

The subject line for this email was: “Couldn’t your business benefit from more qualified leads?” The email is about a free eBook on lead generation and list building for small and medium businesses. Deceptive? You tell me.  Wouldn’t a small business owner benefit from more leads coming into his/her business?

Additionally, that subject line is relevant to just about every business owner and executive out there because lead generation is the key to sustained business growth. Most people realize that, but many uninformed people still want to cry “SPAM!” at every turn no matter how relevant the offer or email happens to be.

FTC Requirement #3: Identify the message as an ad.

What is that I see just above the header image and body of the e-mail? Sure looks like “This is an advertisement.” Check.

Good old Roger isn’t trying to deceive anyone with the email . . . he knows it’s an ad, and he’s not afraid to say so.  🙂

FTC Requirement #4: Tell recipients where you’re located

My full mailing address is clearly stated in the footer section along with a phone number to reach me should someone have questions, concerns, or any other problems.  I took it one step further than required by providing the phone number.  I simply wanted people to know there was a real person behind the email that they could actually talk to.

My objective was/is to be as transparent as possible.

FTC Requirement #5: Tell recipients how to opt out of receiving future email from you.

In the footer section, there is a clear and easy way to opt-out immediately by simply clicking the link.  No more emails or messages from me once you click that. Check.

FTC Requirement #6: Honor opt-out requests promptly

As mentioned in point #5, once you click the link, that’s the end of the messages from me.  Request honored immediately. Checkmate.

FTC Requirement #7: Monitor what others are doing on your behalf

Doesn’t really apply to this situation because I wasn’t hiding behind anything.  Everything was above board and in compliance with the FTC requirements as set forth.

Now, I cannot control someone else mining my email address and sending out emails through a third party as if they were me that I do not control . . . none of us really can to be blunt.

If someone wants to scrounge up a bunch of email addresses and blast away, they can do that although it’s illegal. I can only control what originates from my own accounts and the third parties I employ to carry out those actions. You’re in the same boat so I’m preaching to the choir here.

What constitutes true “SPAM?”

Now, this all brings me to the next and primary point.  I understand that people are fed up with email marketing to a large extent, and I’m no different, but that doesn’t mean every piece of email that comes from someone unknown is SPAM.  I’m sorry . . . look at the FTC regulations again and how they have built in requirements for sending unsolicited emails. Read them and then re-read them.

Where in there does it say “you cannot email someone you don’t know or send them an unsolicited email under any circumstances?” It more or less says that if you’re going to do that, here are the requirements you must follow . . .

Just because you didn’t explicitly ask someone to email you doesn’t constitute SPAM when they do . . . very similar to the telephone.  How many calls do you get per day from people you don’t know? If you run a business, chances are the majority of incoming calls are from unknown people until they become regular customers.

Do you not agree?

The regulations don’t say you can’t ever email someone you don’t know or email them a relevant offer! The entire act was designed to dissuade repeated pharmaceutical and porn related emails that were bogging down people’s inboxes at an alarming rate.

It also was designed to make marketers responsible for the emails they send versus repeatedly sending the same garbage with no recourse for the recipient.  That’s the intent . . . there are plenty of marketers out there that violate the hell out of this even with the regulations in place.  I get that, but I’m not one of them nor are my clients!

The shady marketers setup shop through some offshore email provider and blast away . . . you’ve undoubtedly seen the emails for Viagra, Cialis, and plenty of sketchy offers out there. Let me ask you this: when you get one of those emails, how closely are they following the CAN SPAM requirements? They’re not . . . THAT is SPAM . . . not every single unsolicited email you receive on a daily basis.

Here’s a Challenge for You

Look through the emails that come to you/your business from people inquiring about something business related or looking to do business with you . . . I’d bet 80% of them are from people you don’t know, have never heard of, or have no idea what they’re emailing you for until you open the email.  Right?

If you’re receiving regular business emails from someone, trace the origins of your relationship to the first email exchange (if you can). Who emailed whom first? Were you close business acquaintances prior to that first email? Were you friends? How did the relationship start? My point is someone had to reach out to the other to get things rolling.

Furthermore, how many emails to your business account are from friends that have absolutely zero business purpose? How many of your friends’ emails were explicitly solicited? Remember, this is supposed to be your “business email” so how much junk do you have from people you actually know that aren’t looking to conduct any form of professional business with you?  It’s something to think about, isn’t it?

Email Intent

Consider this blurb from the FTC site:

What matters is the “primary purpose” of the message. To determine the primary purpose, remember that an email can contain three different types of information:

  • Commercial content – which advertises or promotes a commercial product or service, including content on a website operated for a commercial purpose;
  • Transactional or relationship content – which facilitates an already agreed-upon transaction or updates a customer about an ongoing transaction; and
  • Other content – which is neither commercial nor transactional or relationship.

If the message contains only commercial content, its primary purpose is commercial and it must comply with the requirements of CAM-SPAM. If it contains only transactional or relationship content, its primary purpose is transactional or relationship. In that case, it may not contain false or misleading routing information, but is otherwise exempt from most provisions of the CAN-SPAM Act.”

Was I FTC CAN-SPAM Compliant?

SO I ask you, was my email in compliance with the FTC requirements for CAN-SPAM as laid out on their website?

Look, you can flame all you want about unsolicited emails, but they’re part of doing business as long as you comply with the requirements and regulations stipulated.  It’s time the over-sensitive types quit designating every unsolicited email as SPAM especially when the email passes all the tests for compliance.

The Bottom Line

I’m not recommending you ever truly SPAM anyone.  I’m merely stating that relevant commercial email that complies with the regulations set forth by the US FTC is NOT SPAM no matter how many times you want to cry it.

Furthermore, if someone requests to be taken off your list or you repeatedly email them the same stuff over and over, that’s not in compliance with the requirements either so don’t misunderstand the spirit of this post.

If I cried SPAM over every piece of unsolicited email received, I’d never have acquired that first customer, partner or referral because email is a major business communication vehicle today, and it’s one I much prefer over the telephone.

What’s Your Take?

I welcome your comments and feedback. I realize this is a touchy subject for many, but I hope we can engage in some healthy dialogue here.

Think Social Media Doesn't Cut Both Ways?

Over the past couple of hours, I’ve been doing some digging to get the “real inside scoop” on why Perry Belcher “decided” to get out of Internet Marketing Training and the truth behind Andy Jenkins exit from Stompernet.

I’ll get to the latter first . . . Andy’s exit from Stompernet wasn’t as amicable as they’ve tried (poorly) to suggest publicly.  There was a lawsuit between Andy, Stompernet, and Brad Fallon–not exactly the way to part “amicably.” It appears that Brad bought Andy out to avoid facing a lengthy and likely ugly trial. You can look at Andy Jenkins’ claim filed with a Georgia court by clicking on the link. Turns out Brad Fallon wasn’t doing a whole lot behind the scenes except spending money so Jenkins’ hand was somewhat forced, and I always thought I smelled a rat when they made the hasty change announcement back in July.

For full disclosure: I have the StomperNet “Stomping the Search Engines” DVDs, and count me as unimpressed.  Not to be a honk, but my Search Engine Ninja program gives you much more SEO training for a lot less, and there isn’t as much fluff, flare, and theory involved . . . just good old step-by-step stuff you can implement, but I digress.

My personal prediction is StomperNet will die a slow but painful death over the next 12-18 months. If you read the filed complaint, you’ll see some verbiage that suggests the company is in serious financial trouble already so I don’t feel like that prediction is too “risky.”

As an aside: I hope Paul Lemberg keeps doing his thing . . . just with a different organization behind him because Paul’s stuff is really good.  I hated to see that he aligned with StomperNet for his Formula 5 training program, and that is the primary reason I didn’t get it although I always enjoy learning from Paul.

Perry’s “demise” is more of a matter of massively over promoting and over pricing an absolute garbage product (as it turns out).  There is another similar product currently being offered in the Internet Marketing space that hopefully will be next on the “fraud” hit-list.

Before you think I’m piling on Perry, I came to “like” Perry through our occasional interactions on Twitter (which his account is completely gone by the way . . . all 110,000 followers worth), and I THOUGHT he was a “good guy.” Then I started doing my private investigator work to find that he is a convicted felon for defrauding people out of hundreds of thousands of dollars over the past 10 years for bogus medical products. I’m not one to cast stones at others that I don’t know unless it’s warranted, and it’s warranted here.  Anytime you take advantage of people to that degree, get caught then go back for more . . . you ain’t a “good guy!” Sorry, Per.

As for the lessons to be learned from these cases . . . social media can build you up rapidly, but it can rip you down even faster. Think of all the time and energy Perry put into building a following of 110,000 on Twitter, the countless blogs he setup to rebuild his “reputation,” myriad videos, and all the exposure social media gained him as he was promoting his “Social Media Money System.” His “system” simply didn’t deliver on the promise to show people how to make money with social media or grow a business for it’s $997 minimum price tag. People probably wouldn’t have been that upset with him if the price tag were something more reasonable like $97 or $197.

Bottom line: it only took about a month to tear everything down that took years to build . . . thanks to social media.

Perry now has a metric ton of guilt to carry around . . . knowingly defrauding people out of millions of dollars as he masqueraded around as this “great guy.” As I always say, you can lie to others, but you can’t lie to yourself. Now Perry can’t even lie to others . . . he’s been branded as a fraud twice in very public forums. The very forums he used to rebuild his reputation from the last fiasco. That brings me to this: what would you do if you were in his shoes?

Final point: If you’re looking for help with social media for growing your BUSINESS, seek out those that are using it to grow their businesses today . . . not somebody who can show you how to win an online popularity contest. Advertising firms aren’t the answer either because they haven’t figured out how to monetize social media for their own firms so there is a lot of blind leading the blind right now.

Don’t get ripped off!!!

Domino's–You SUCK!!!!

I just placed a pizza order to be delivered by Domino’s at 5:30 PM.  Their fancy order tracker (which I think is pretty cool, but I’m not sure this is what they had in mind) informed me that the pizza was baked and put into a box at 5:40 PM.  At 6:04, it informed me that “Joe–a delivery expert” was on his way to my door with the pizza.  Granted, their 30 minutes was already shot by 6:04 by four minutes, but I was looking forward to the pizza even if it was closer to 40 minutes.

Domino's Order Tracker

At 6:29, Joe arrives at my door to which I informed him that I’d give him a couple of bucks for his trouble, but I didn’t think the pizza was worth a dime after sitting that long so I wanted my credit card refunded for the amount of the pizza.  His reply was “I’m sorry man, we got busy.”  Not my problem Joe–that’s a sign of poor management not poor customer expectations.  Your company set the expectation with “you’ve got 30 minutes” not 60 minutes!  I understand pizza chains get busy, and it’s tough to find quality help at many of them because gas prices are hurting all of us, but 60 minutes is too long regardless of how busy the store happened to be.

I understand that the slogan is not a guarantee, but it does set the expectation whether that is right or wrong.  Regardless, it’s unacceptable to take 60 minutes to deliver a pizza especially when the store location is about 3 miles away.  I should have just hopped in my car and picked the damn thing up myself, but that’s the whole concept behind delivery isn’t it–convenience?

Needless to say, I won’t be ordering from Domino’s anymore! If you’ve had a similar experience, share it here!